A rough guide to the interpretation of I 2 in the context of meta-analyses of randomized trials is as follows: 0%–40%: might not be significant; 30%–60%: may represent moderate heterogeneity, 50%–90%: may represent substantial heterogeneity, and 75%–100%: considerable heterogeneity.[ 14 ] RESULTS The literature search yielded a total of 211 studies.
← all excerpts
The comparison of interrupted and continuous suturing technique in Snodgrass urethroplasty in patients with primary hypospadias: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
1
—
—