Barely Significant

Excerpts

15,661 sentences

only marginally significantP = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0gold
Some studies showed significant differences ( P = 0.09,[ 66 ] P = 0.063,[ 146 ] P = 0.054,[ 31 ] which were only marginally significant, P = 0.000,[ 71 ] P = 0.000,[ 144 ] P = 0.003,[ 65 ] P = 0.000,[ 4 ] P = 0.000[ 70 ]) and some did not demonstrate significant or marginally significant differences ( P > 0.1).[ 66 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 176 ] TREATMENT OF CONGENITALLY MISSING TEETH CMT has direct clinical implications.
quite significantp = 10 −570.0× alphagold
The two partial correlations were both quite significant ( f versus txn rate/tlns per mRNA | protein production rate, complex membership: Spearman partial r = 0.227, n = 4,746, p = 10 −57 ; complex membership versus txn rate/tlns per mRNA | protein production rate, f: Spearman partial r = 0.147, n = 4,746, p = 10 −24 ), suggesting that fitness effect and protein complex membership are independently associated with the expression strategy that minimizes stochastic fluctuation.
nearly significantp < 2e-160.0× alphagold
The above nearly significant interaction, when comparing the 50 vs. 100% treatments, is marginal in comparison to the differences in density across weeks ( z = −16.916, p < 2e-16).
The parasites of my rival are my friends.
Front Microbiol · 2023 · PMC10264602
quite significantp = 1.2E-080.0× alphagold
For example, of the 559 genes in the Chen androgen signature (448 of which were represented in at least three prostate tumor datasets), 29 were correlated ( p <0.05) with KLK3 in at least three out of the four prostate tumor datasets; by chance, nine were expected, and so the amount of actual overlap was quite significant ( p = 1.2E-08).
nearly significantP -value = 5.19 × 10 −80.0× alphagold
We run a GWAS Cox model, with the first 10 PCs, age, age 2 , sex, period of infection and patient series as covariates and we found one variant (rs117011822) associated with survival at P -value < 5.0 × 10 −8 (genome-wide significance level) and another one (rs7208524) nearly significant ( P -value = 5.19 × 10 −8 ).
slightly significantp = 7.10 −80.0× alphagold
Auditory spectrotemporal receptive fields (STRFs) (Figure 9C,Di ) were only moderately affected in Otogl +/− mutant mice relative to Otogl +/+ controls, with a slightly significant change in response latency ( p = 7.10 −8 , nested two‐way ANOVA, group effect, animal factor nested in group, F(1,1379) = 29.5) and a 5.8% decrease in frequency bandwidth ( p = 0.048, nested ANOVA, F(1,1379) = 3.9), with no change in maximum evoked firing rate ( p = 0.06, nested ANOVA, F(1,1379) = 3.5).
nearly significantP = 9.0 × 10 −80.0× alphagold
For example, there were significant associations between PTVs in PSAP and increased progranulin ( GRN ; P = 5.5 × 10 −17 ; β = 2.60; 95% CI, 1.99 to 3.21) and cathepsin B ( P = 1.2 × 10 −11 ; β = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.70), and a nearly significant association with increased cathepsin D ( P = 9.0 × 10 −8 ; β = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.20) (Supplementary Table 8 ).