Barely Significant

Hall of fame

The boldest claims in the corpus: sentences that reach for the language of near-significance while reporting a p-value well past 0.1. Ranked by distance from the threshold, so the entry at the top travelled the furthest to get there.

  1. 01not significantly significantp = 0.99820.0× alpha
    Similarly, dissolved oxygen had a negative effect on the detection of Campylobacter although the relationship is not significantly significant (p = 0.998, OR = 0, b = −22.78).
  2. 02a slight significancep -value < 90%18.0× alpha
    The data of attacked olives from the last two dates exhibited a slight significance ( p -value < 90%), namely p < 0.056 on the date of 8 October and p < 0.068 on the date of 21 October. 2.4.
  3. 03nearly significantp = 0.8917.8× alpha
    Despite these nearly significant changes in FEV 1 and FeNO, the FEV 1 /FVC ratio was unchanged ( p = 0.89), suggesting that the children’s overall ability to execute the test maneuvers may have played a large role.
  4. 04significantly not differentp = 0.8842517.7× alpha
    The latency of head raising was significantly not different at different treatment, mean effect of treatment (F [1,72] =0.03978 ; p = 0.88425), mean effect of age (F [3,72] =3.317 ; p = 0.0246) and interaction (F [3,72] =2.801 ; p = 0.0460) (Fig. 2 ).
  5. 05not significantly significantp = 0.8717.4× alpha
    Although there was a decrease is arthroplasty waste events between 2010 and 2011, the reduction was not significantly significant ( p = 0.87).
  6. 06nearly significantP = 0.784515.7× alpha
    puteoserpentis was nearly significant: sum of deviation = 3.9587 (df = 7; P = 0.7845); 7.7511 (df = 7; P = 0.3550); 13.3811 (df = 7; P = 0.0633), for B. azoricus Rb vs B. thermophilus 7S; B. azoricus MG vs B. thermophilus 7S; and B. puteoserpentis vs B. thermophilus 7S respectively.
  7. 07significantly not differentp = 0.761415.2× alpha
    This resulted in significantly not different antithrombin levels in both age classes, children younger than one year ( p = 0.7614) and older than one year ( p = 0.1309).
  8. 08moderately significantp = 0.7114.2× alpha
    MSL had a moderately significant and positive correlation with SFW (r p = 0.71 **), SDW (r p = 0.76 **), RDW (r p = 0.73 **), and TDM (r p = 0.64 **).
  9. 09not quite significantP = 0.64913.0× alpha
    The difference was not quite significant ( P = 0.649).
  10. 10moderately significantP = 0.63612.7× alpha
    We observed that alcohol consumption (AOR = 1.53; 95% CI = 0.96–2.44; P = 0.068) was moderately significant, while liver cirrhosis (AOR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.22–2.52; P = 0.636) and HCV infection (AOR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.11–2.05; P = 0.329) were not significantly associated with the development of CCA.
  11. 11not significantly significantp = 0.61412.3× alpha
    However, and notably, the subtle difference between the expression level of Slc14a1 in the hippocampus of the AD model rats and the control rats is not significantly significant ( p = 0.614) ( Fig 4B ).
  12. 12only marginally significantP = 0.6112.2× alpha
    However, in the multivariate logistic regression analysis of the comparative cohort, the application of the same algorithm for prediction of lymph node involvement was only marginally significant and only due to the impact of vascular invasion (CD8: P = 0.61; vascular invasion: P = 0.02; tumor border configuration: P = 0.166).
  13. 13not quite significantP = 0.59411.9× alpha
    Interaction between MC4R rs17782313 and energy and fat intake to determine the risk of obesity There was relevant, but not quite significant ( P = 0.594), interaction between energy intake and MC4R polymorphism in determining the risk of obesity after adjusting for confounders such as age, gender, area, total activity and smoking status ( P = 0.0594; Table 4 ).
  14. 14only marginally significantp = 0.57511.5× alpha
    Compared to the reference level (no involvement), all levels of participation are positively valued, although with different levels of significance: medium-low involvement (0.258; p = 0.002) is positive and significant; medium-high involvement (0.151; p = 0.073) is positive but only marginally significant; high involvement (0.049; p = 0.575) is positive but not significant.
  15. 15only marginally significantp = 0.5611.2× alpha
    Testing 1078 miRNAs and 211 TF binding sites separately, we found one miRNA and 4 TFs consistently enriched across the 19 datasets for the up-down pattern, relative to up-up; however, the results were non-significant and only marginally significant compared to permutations (one-sided p = 0.56 and p = 0.069), respectively.
  16. 16nearly significantp = 0.5511.0× alpha
    Using the cutoffs of GLS (−15%) and CS (−23.3%), we demonstrated that GLS ( p = 0.05, nearly significant), but not CS ( p = 0.55), might provide prognostic information ( Figure 1B and 1C ).
  17. 17not significantly significantP = 0.54811.0× alpha
    Whilst the difference in the specificity rate between the two evaluated methods was not significantly significant ( P = 0.548), the difference between sensitivity rates was significant ( P = 0.004), indicating that bleach sedimentation is more sensitive.
  18. 18nearly significantp = 0.535310.7× alpha
    In all three conditions, we found that females were more likely than males to act altruistically, although the effect was nearly significant only in the two conditions with an exit option (Rank-sum, p = 0.5353, p = 0.0488, p = 0.0615, respectively).
  19. 19nearly significantp = 0.5310.6× alpha
    Results also showed a nearly significant difference in the IFB scores between mothers younger than 35 years and those aged 35 years or more ( p = 0.53).
  20. 20not significantly significantP = 0.5310.6× alpha
    Analysis using a random-effects model in view of the heterogeneous results between the effect sizes (I 2 = 90%; P < 0.01) indicated that patients who underwent BKA had a slightly higher Oxford knee score than those who underwent TKA, although the difference was not significantly significant (MD = 1.06; 95% CI2.29, 4.41; P = 0.53; Fig. 2 C).
  21. 21not quite significantp = 0.52610.5× alpha
    The 2nd versus 1st quartiles of the di- ortho congeners [OR = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.74)] was significant but inverse while the difference between the 4th versus 1st quartiles of the tri- and tetra- ortho congeners [OR = 2.90 (95% CI: 0.99, 8.51)] was positive and not quite significant ( p = 0.526).
  22. 22not significantly significantp=0.51710.3× alpha
    In this study, female gender was associated with SVR failure (OR: 3.20) but was not significantly significant (p=0.517), which may be due to the low sample size.
  23. 23nearly significantp =0.5010.0× alpha
    Reduction in collegial support (standardized β=0.23, p =0.001) absorbed the effect of work-home interface stress, and the lack of reduction in emotional demands became nearly significant among men (standardized β=0.16, p =0.50; Block 2, Table 2c ).
  24. 24nearly significantp = 0.499810.0× alpha
    While there was no correlation with day 1 cocaine-induced behavior ( p = 0.4998), behavior on days 2 and 3 was strongly correlated, behavior on day 4 was not significant ( p = 0.1793), and behavior on day 5 was nearly significant ( p = 0.0633).
  25. 25only marginally significantP = 0.499.8× alpha
    Although the odds of EBF sequentially increased at D28 across phase periods, it was only marginally significant for phase 2 (phase 1 OR = 1.3, P = 0.49; phase 2 OR = 1.6, P = 0.10).