marginally significantp = .097
A subordinate ANOVA that was run separately for distractor noise patches, including the factor Cueing (cued, uncued) and the factor Extracted Field (Localizer, Surround), indicated that the main effect of Cueing was marginally significant ( F (1,31) = 2.938, p = .097, ηp 2 =. 087) with a significant interaction between Cueing and Extracted Field (F (1,31) = 8.047, p = .008, ηp 2 =.206 ) , confirming higher cueing effects for the Surround than for the Localizer (cued vs. uncued Noise Localizer: t (31) = -.899, p = .376, Cohen’s d: -.16; cued vs. uncued Noise Surround: t (31) = -2.36, p = .025, Cohen’s d: -.42).