marginally significantp = 0.006
The linear regression model explained 54.4% of the variance of ECAS‐Language scores ( F (19, 219) = 13.77; p < 0.001), with only the ECAS‐Executive positively predicting them at α adjusted = 0.0028 ( β = 0.46; t (219) = 5.97; p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.07), and a similar, although marginally significant, effect being found for ECAS‐Visuo‐spatial ( β = 0.15; t (219) = 2.78; p = 0.006; η 2 = 0.02).