marginally nonsignificantp = 0.050
Thus, the MVIC declined by ~3.36% which was marginally nonsignificant (t (18) = 2.103, p = 0.050).
Thus, the MVIC declined by ~3.36% which was marginally nonsignificant (t (18) = 2.103, p = 0.050).
AF max was statistically similar comparing all procedures (regular, CL, and CL-CT) ( Table 2 , Figure 3 a), although close to significance.
AFiso max differed highly significantly between CL vs.