borderline significantp = 0.057
There was a significant between-group main effect ( F (2, 133) = 6.742, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.092) for MS 3 duration, a significant cue × group interaction effect ( F (2, 133) = 5.246, p = 0.006, η p 2 = 0.073) and a significant between-group main effect ( F (2, 133) = 9.746, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.128) for MS 3 coverage; and there was a significant cue × group interaction effect ( F (2, 133) = 3.369, p = 0.037, η p 2 = 0.048) and a borderline significant between-group main effect ( F (2, 133) = 2.935, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.042) for MS 4 coverage, and a significant cue × group interaction effect ( F (2, 133) = 5.669, p = 0.004, η p 2 = 0.079) and a significant between-group main effect ( F (2, 133) = 6.640, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.091) for MS 4 occurren