marginally significantp = .052
In Model 2 ( Fig 4A ), RAN ( p = .002) and arithmetic ( p < .001) were significant predictors of reading ( R 2 = .42), while grapheme-phoneme processing was marginally significant ( p = .052).
In Model 2 ( Fig 4A ), RAN ( p = .002) and arithmetic ( p < .001) were significant predictors of reading ( R 2 = .42), while grapheme-phoneme processing was marginally significant ( p = .052).