Finally, after excluding the nonsignificant effect of ancestry (14% p = .084), the effect of climate was highly significant when controlling for geography and explained 19% of total genetic variation (40% of the variation explained by the full model III), while geography itself was not significant (16%; p = .0532; Table 2 ).
← all excerpts
Biodiversity protection against anthropogenic climate change: Conservation prioritization of <i>Castanea sativa</i> in the South Caucasus based on genetic and ecological metrics.
1
—
—