borderline significancep = 0.065
However, caution should be taken when interpreting the effect of sex on overall EF scores because this effect had borderline significance ( p = 0.065), and the effect sizes were relatively small ( d = 0.13).
However, caution should be taken when interpreting the effect of sex on overall EF scores because this effect had borderline significance ( p = 0.065), and the effect sizes were relatively small ( d = 0.13).
In addition, a post hoc comparison showed a marginally significant gender difference in the EF scores, ( F (1, 752) = 3.41, p = 0.065, d = 0.13), with girls ( M = 100.98, SD = 18.83) scoring higher than boys ( M = 98.46, SD = 18.80).