highly significant− log 10 ( p ) > 3.
Although these methods had a lot in common in highly significant MTAs, there was a difference between the methods in terms of significant SNPs at the level of − log 10 ( p ) > 3.
Although these methods had a lot in common in highly significant MTAs, there was a difference between the methods in terms of significant SNPs at the level of − log 10 ( p ) > 3.