Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Plantar threshold sensitivity assessment using an automated tool-Clinical assessment comparison between a control population without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with and without neuropathy symptoms.

PLoS One · 2023 · PMC10328367 · PMID 37418442

3
hedged sentences
0.0005
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0540
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP = 0.0005actually significant
The Welch’s ANOVA assessment found that the difference in mean FBS between the groups was highly significant ( P = 0.0005 ) ( Table 1 ).

also in 33,666 other papers

barely insignificantP = 0.054so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
TSI Norm versus FBS Linear regression analysis found that Group 1 showed the strongest relationship between TSI Norm and FBS (R 2 = 0.1819) but was barely insignificant ( P = 0.054), Fig 9D .

also in 4 other papers

borderline significantno p-value reported
The Permutational ANOVA found a contrary finding, in which there was significance between the groups, however it should be noted that upon the first run of the Permutation ANOVA the P -value was equal to 0.0504 which is borderline significant.

also in 2,689 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.