marginally significantp = 0.078
For task-related self-efficacy (see Figure 3 ), compared with T1 task performance, participants receiving positive feedback had improved levels of self-efficacy compared to those receiving negative feedback and those receiving control feedback at the second CPT, whereas the task self-efficacy levels of the subsequent two groups did not differ from each other at the second CPT. The Condition*Time interaction was marginally significant on intended effort ( p = 0.078), though Positive condition showed larger intended effort investment compared to Negative condition at the second CPT.