Neural dissociation between reward and salience prediction errors through the lens of optimistic bias.

Hum Brain Mapp · 2023 · PMC10365237 · PMID 37334979

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0590

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < .001actually significant

As expected, they predicted gains more on 3‐cue trials than 2‐cue trials ( p < .001), which was in turn more than 1‐cue trials ( p < .001), as revealed by a highly significant main effect of winning probability, F (2, 74) = 143.44, p < .001, ηp 2 = 0.80.

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantp = .059so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The ANOVA model revealed a marginally significant main effect of context, F (1, 33) = 3.84, p = .059, ηp 2 = 0.10, and a significant main effect of cue type, F (1, 33) = 125.34, p < .001, ηp 2 = 0.79.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.