Across the 3 sites, only Nagongera showed a marginally statistically significant, but small difference between study arms, with an RR of 1.19 (1.00–1.41) greater in the intervention arm, whereas no difference was seen for Aduku (1.04; 95% CI: .93–1.16) and Kihihi (.94; 95% CI: .85–1.05).
← all excerpts
Impact of the Introduction of a Package of Diagnostic Tools, Diagnostic Algorithm, and Training and Communication on Outpatient Acute Fever Case Management at 3 Diverse Sites in Uganda: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
1
—
—