marginally significantp = 0.06
Moreover, a simple effect analysis showed that, in the case of high-SES individuals, the individual whose autonomy need was satisfied had a larger impact bias than the individual whose autonomy need was not satisfied, which was marginally significant with a large effect size, i.e., M satisfied = 0.78, SD = 1.09, M unsatisfied = 0.23, SD = 1.17, t (58) = 1.88, 95% CI [−0.03, 1.13], p = 0.06 and d = 0.96.