Rewarding outcomes enhance attentional capture and delay attentional disengagement.

PeerJ · 2023 · PMC10441522 · PMID 37609441

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The RTs between neutral-distractor and no-distractor showed a marginally significant difference ( t = 2.19, p = .06, all p value corrected by Holm method).This results suggested that participants’ attention was captured more in reward-distractor than in loss-distractor and neutral-distractor condition, see Fig. 2A .

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.