failed to reach significancep = .034
Although significant at the original .05 level, LFH/FFH narrowly failed to reach significance at the adjusted level, F (1, 148) = 4.56, p = .034, partial η 2 = .03. fWHR was not significant.
Although significant at the original .05 level, LFH/FFH narrowly failed to reach significance at the adjusted level, F (1, 148) = 4.56, p = .034, partial η 2 = .03. fWHR was not significant.
Across the two samples (Study 1, Convict sample n = 387, M age = 41.96, SD = 11.41, range = 20–77, and Study 2, nonconvict sample, n = 152, M age = 48.83, SD = 15.4, representing each decade of life from 20–70s), it was found that there was a small but significant negative relationship between age and fWHR, and this was linear with time (i.e., it did not remain static for a period and then show a significant decline).