marginally significantp = .058
An ANCOVA 4 comparing the number of smiles that participants reported detecting (hits and false alarms) across the conditions revealed a marginally significant effect of prestige, F (2,92) = 3.68, p = .058, η 2 = .04.
An ANCOVA 4 comparing the number of smiles that participants reported detecting (hits and false alarms) across the conditions revealed a marginally significant effect of prestige, F (2,92) = 3.68, p = .058, η 2 = .04.