Which is More Important, Proposer Identity or Allocation Motive? Event-Related Potential in Economic Decision-Making.

The interaction between proposer identity, allocation motive, and offer type was marginally significant [ F (1,85) =4.61, p < 0.05, η p 2 =0.06], and post multiple comparisons indicated that when fair offers were presented in a random motive, the rejection rate for depressed college student proposers (11.67%) was significantly lower than that of health college student proposers (31.11%) [ F (1,85) =10.62, p < 0.01, η p 2 =0.11]; when the proposer was a healthy college student, the rejection rate of a fair offer for selfish motives was lower than the rejection rate of a fair offer for a random motive [ F (1,85) =13.95, p < 0.001, η p 2 =0.14] (see Table 1 and Figure 2 for details).

also in 26,082 other papers