marginally significantp = .03
Regarding rapid naming accuracy which had marginally significant improvement after the intervention ( p = .03), the trend of improvement in TPT ( p = .05) also seemed more apparent than that of CLR ( p = .18).
Regarding rapid naming accuracy which had marginally significant improvement after the intervention ( p = .03), the trend of improvement in TPT ( p = .05) also seemed more apparent than that of CLR ( p = .18).