We discovered a difference in performance between stim and null trials that was of borderline significance (See the section “Neither peripheral stimuli nor reward shifts attention during task” in the Results section and also Fig 5B).
← all excerpts
Pupil Size Is Sensitive to Low-Level Stimulus Features, Independent of Arousal-Related Modulation.
2
—
—
The sentences
We found that behavioral accuracy was slightly higher during stim trials compared with null trials, and this difference was marginally significant, but only when using a parametric statistical test [stim trial, 77.0% ± 11.6; null trial, 73.85 ± 15.9 (mean ± SD), average difference = 3.554%, t (40) = 2.134, p = 0.039, 95% CI [0.195 6.914], paired t test; Z = 1.64, p = 0.101, 95% BCa.CI [−1.839, 6.441], Wilcoxon signed-rank test].