highly significantP ≤ 0.05
The impact contrast of the microleakage test between control and ICON pre-treated groups was shown in Tables 3 and 4 , where data point toward a highly significant difference at P ≤ 0.05 between all groups, and assessing the microleakage test with and without implementation of ICON, which was used as a preventative measure procedure on induced white spot lesions at the enamel surface,[ 28 , 29 ] Table 5 shows a marked difference in microleakage between groups.