highly significantp < 0.0001
In males, the difference was highly significant (547.67 ± 19.77 vs. 449.35 ± 13.34, p < 0.0001), and a comparable trend was observed in females (352 ± 16.73 vs. 316.31 ± 11.22, p < 0.0001).
In males, the difference was highly significant (547.67 ± 19.77 vs. 449.35 ± 13.34, p < 0.0001), and a comparable trend was observed in females (352 ± 16.73 vs. 316.31 ± 11.22, p < 0.0001).