Own-Age Effects in a Face-Emotion Recognition Intervention for Children With ASD--Evidence From Eye Movements.

Psychol Res Behav Manag · 2023 · PMC10629357 · PMID 37942440

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0590

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0670

boldest claim

The sentences

borderline significantp =0.059so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Thirdly, A repeated-measures ANOVA of 2 (assessment: preintervention, postintervention) × 2 (group: own-age face intervention group, other-age face intervention group) × 2 (faces: child picture, adult picture) was used for the ocular interest area, as shown in Figure 4 . Results Whole-Map Eye Movement Index Analysis in Both Group Dwell Time The interaction between assessment and group type was borderline significant, F (1, 19)=4.6, p =0.059, η p 2 =0.31, and further simple effects analysis revealed that after the intervention, the same age face intervention group gazed at the pictures significantly longer than the other-age face intervention group ( p =0.045).

also in 11,409 other papers

marginally significantp =0.067so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Fixation Times The interaction between assessment, picture type, and group type was marginally significant, F (1, 19)=4.2, p =0.067, η p 2 =0.3, and further simple effects analysis revealed that after the intervention, the own-age face intervention group gazed at children’s pictures significantly more often postintervention than preintervention ( p =0.043) and significantly more often than the other-age face intervention group ( p =0.018).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.