marginal significancep = 0.052
The phase × outcome interaction showed marginal significance in the midline central area ( F (1, 34) = 4.047, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.106).
The phase × outcome interaction showed marginal significance in the midline central area ( F (1, 34) = 4.047, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.106).
The result of simple analysis suggested that under the anger condition, the N1 amplitude showed a marginally significant decrease in negativity from the before phase to the after phase (anger: after > before, p = 0.070), whereas no significant distinction was found under the happy condition ( p = 0.218).