Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Deep brain stimulation for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Hum Neurosci · 2023 · PMC10719838 · PMID 38098761

1
hedged sentence
0.0001
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0001
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.0001actually significant
The test for residual heterogeneity was highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 4.4.1.2 DBS primary for treating chronic pain (DBS-P) analysis The test of moderators for age as a predictor was not significant F(df1 = 1, df2 = 22) = 1.1608, ( p = 0.29), indicating that age did not significantly moderate the effectiveness of DBS-P for chronic pain The estimated amount of residual heterogeneity (tau^2) was 43.86, indicating considerable heterogeneity among the studies.

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.