marginally significantP = 0.09
A marginally significant difference between the two emphasizes was observed: t (47) = −1.71, P = 0.09, d = −0.25), which was also indicated by a weak interaction between salience and performance (F (1, 47) = 2.95, P = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.39, Fig. 3A2 ).