highly significantP < 0.0001
As shown in the table, the model was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and well fitted ( p -value of the misfit error term was 0.0823 > 0.05).
As shown in the table, the model was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and well fitted ( p -value of the misfit error term was 0.0823 > 0.05).
a* values showed an increasing trend with the prolongation of storage period ( Fig. 2 .F), and the differences in the trend of the changes within the same group were significant ( P < 0.05), and the delaying effect of SAEW on the increase of a* value was better than other treatments ( P < 0.05). b* value showed an overall increase with the prolongation of the storage period ( Fig. 2 .G), and only the b* value of the SAEW group was consistently and significantly lower than that of the other groups during the storage period ( P < 0.05), i.e., the SAEW was better than the other treatments.
The overall trend of L* values in each group showed a decreasing trend with increasing storage time ( Fig. 2 .E), and the differences in L* values between NaClO and AlEW groups were always insignificant ( P > 0.05), whereas the inhibitory effect of SAEW on the decrease of L* values was more significant ( P < 0.05) in comparison to the other groups. a* values showed an