fell short of significanceP = 0.11
A qualitatively similar difference in rise-times was seen in response to Pilo application, although it fell short of significance (iGluSnFR: 99 ± 18 ms, n = 5 mice, average ± SEM; iGABASnFR: 139 ± 9 ms, n = 4 mice, P = 0.11, unpaired t -test).