marginally significantp = 0.084
The two-way interaction was marginally significant [F (5, 175) = 1.982, p = 0.084, ηp 2 = 0.054].
The two-way interaction was marginally significant [F (5, 175) = 1.982, p = 0.084, ηp 2 = 0.054].
The reason for this marginal significance may be that the five participants with ASD showed a more significant temporal ratio effect for angry expressions ( Figure 3B ).