All other moderators were not statistically significant Influential analysis and publication bias The influential analysis suggested the instability of the pooled effect estimate from post-tDCS evaluation because the significant effect became marginally significant each time one of four studies was removed ( Boggio et al., 2009 ; Cespón et al., 2019 ; Cotelli et al., 2014 ; Gangemi & Fabio, 2020 ).
← all excerpts
Efficacy and safety of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in memory deficits in patients with Alzheimer's disease: Meta-analysis and systematic review
1
—
—