failed to reach significancep = 0.252
Subgroup analyses showed smaller correlations, which again failed to reach significance (INT: r = −0.187, p = 0.252; CON: r = −0.18, p = 0.322).
Subgroup analyses showed smaller correlations, which again failed to reach significance (INT: r = −0.187, p = 0.252; CON: r = −0.18, p = 0.322).
These aspects also need to be taken into account when considering the observation that the time-by-group interactions were often driven by both an increasing trend in the training group and a decreasing trend in the control group.