highly significantp ≤ 2.2 × 10 − 16
It was highly significant ( p ≤ 2.2 × 10 − 16 ) and explained 24% of the variation for this trait (Fig. 6a ).
It was highly significant ( p ≤ 2.2 × 10 − 16 ) and explained 24% of the variation for this trait (Fig. 6a ).