borderline significantP =0.07
When we added individual PWV measures separately, the largest improvement of discrimination was seen by cfPWV, although it was borderline significant (∆C statistic 0.008 [95% CI, −0.001 to 0.018]; P =0.07) (Table 4 ).
When we added individual PWV measures separately, the largest improvement of discrimination was seen by cfPWV, although it was borderline significant (∆C statistic 0.008 [95% CI, −0.001 to 0.018]; P =0.07) (Table 4 ).