marginally significantp = .042
The pattern was very similar to our finding on K score: the real rTMS group showed significant or marginally significant increase in amplitudes of CDAs for the conditions with distractors (2T2D condition: t = −2.792, p = .042 for 300–900 ms, t = −2.007, p = .059 for 1300–1900 ms; 2T2Dretrocue condition: t = −2.051, p = .059 for 300–900 ms, t = −2.525, p = .042 for 1300–1900 ms), but not for the conditions without distractors (all p s > .05).