marginal significancep = 0.084
The latter trend held true for the second data set with marginal significance for the continuous measure of accuracy as well ( r = -0.312, t 19 = 1.43, p = 0.084).
The latter trend held true for the second data set with marginal significance for the continuous measure of accuracy as well ( r = -0.312, t 19 = 1.43, p = 0.084).
The models featuring at least one parameter for hysteretic bias could replicate these 1-back effects with comparable psychometric functions ( p < 0.05), and while models without the parameter could not ( p > 0.05), the solitary constant bias of the 2C model does deceptively mimic repetition with a nonsignificant trend.