A sensitivity analysis omitting the Eisele studies, given their different approach using four rounds of active case detection as opposed to continuous passive case detection, showed a marginally significant reduction in parasite prevalence (pooled OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.34–1.01) ( Supplemental Figure 8 ).
← all excerpts
Reactive Case Detection and Treatment and Reactive Drug Administration for Reducing Malaria Transmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
1
—
—