Barely Significant
← all excerpts

The ambiguity of "true" in English, German, and Chinese.

Asian J Philos · 2024 · PMC11018558 · PMID 38633885

1
hedged sentence
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantno p-value reported
While only a small minority of the participants think that Jennifer’s answer in the Chemistry scenario is true, 12.50% (95% CI (5.21%, 19.79%)), participants were split in the Party case with 51.25% (95% CI (40.23%, 62.27%)) answering “true.” The difference between both conditions was highly significant ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t = 6.163, p < 0.001$$\end{document} t = 6.163 , p < 0.001 ), and a large effect size Cohen’s d of 0.908. 34 participants selected “wahr” in the Party case and “falsch” in the Chemistry case, indicating that true is ambiguous not just in English but also in German.

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.