trending toward significanceP = 0.25
Greater EC FTP slope was not correlated with NM decline in the PiB– group but was trending toward significance in the PiB+ group (PiB–: r = −0.18, P = 0.25; PiB+ r = −0.3, P = 0.08; Figure 2B ).
Greater EC FTP slope was not correlated with NM decline in the PiB– group but was trending toward significance in the PiB+ group (PiB–: r = −0.18, P = 0.25; PiB+ r = −0.3, P = 0.08; Figure 2B ).