a numerical trendp = 0.09
Nonetheless, at 1 year, a numerical trend towards a higher incidence of target lesion revascularizations was noted in the DCB group (22.1% vs. 13.5%; p = 0.09) [ 49 ].
Nonetheless, at 1 year, a numerical trend towards a higher incidence of target lesion revascularizations was noted in the DCB group (22.1% vs. 13.5%; p = 0.09) [ 49 ].
The classification was associated with an increasing trend of target lesion revascularization across ISR types [ 17 ].