Regarding choice, higher money and shock levels led to more approach and avoidance, respectively (as preregistered, statistical effects whose Bayesian 95% and 90% posterior highest density interval ‘HDI’ did not include 0 were interpreted as ‘significant’ and ‘marginally significant’, respectively, see Methods for details; B money = 1.54, HDI 95% = [1.26, 1.83]; B shocks = −1.10, HDI 95% = [−1.35, −0.84]; Fig. 2a ).
← all excerpts
The neurocomputational link between defensive cardiac states and approach-avoidance arbitration under threat.
1
—
—