highly significantp < 0.001
An ANOVA on centroid size with skull and method as factors showed that the method itself was not significant (p = 0.06), while skull and observer were highly significant (p < 0.001) (Table 3 ).
An ANOVA on centroid size with skull and method as factors showed that the method itself was not significant (p = 0.06), while skull and observer were highly significant (p < 0.001) (Table 3 ).