highly significantp < 0.001
Furthermore, the correlation coefficient r of the two weight measurement methods was 0.9410, R 2 was 0.8854, and there was a highly significant correlation between the two methods ( p < 0.001).
Furthermore, the correlation coefficient r of the two weight measurement methods was 0.9410, R 2 was 0.8854, and there was a highly significant correlation between the two methods ( p < 0.001).