highly significantp<0.001
There was a highly significant (p<0.001) improvement in accuracy over time during the 3 phases for the whole group.
There was a highly significant (p<0.001) improvement in accuracy over time during the 3 phases for the whole group.
Over the 3 phases, there was a numerical trend towards a slightly better accuracy from 23.6% to 28.0%—which was also observed within the two subgroups (residents and oncologists)—which however lacked statistical significance in all subgroups (see table 2 ).