Barely Significant
← all excerpts

How accurate is clinical prognostication by oncologists during routine practice in a general hospital and can it be improved by a specific prognosis training programme: a prospective interventional study.

BMJ Open · 2024 · PMC11191806 · PMID 38890134

2
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0010
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp<0.001actually significant
There was a highly significant (p<0.001) improvement in accuracy over time during the 3 phases for the whole group.

also in 42,942 other papers

a numerical trendno p-value reported
Over the 3 phases, there was a numerical trend towards a slightly better accuracy from 23.6% to 28.0%—which was also observed within the two subgroups (residents and oncologists)—which however lacked statistical significance in all subgroups (see table 2 ).

also in 488 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.