Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Rates and Predictors of Disengagement and Strength of Engagement for People With a First Episode of Psychosis Using Early Intervention Services: A Systematic Review of Predictors and Meta-analysis of Disengagement Rates.

Schizophr Bull Open · 2022 · PMC11205872 · PMID 39144778

2
hedged sentences
0.0001
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0001
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP < .0001actually significant
Moderators of Disengagement Rates Meta-regression analysis ( figure 2C ) found earlier studies to be significant and negatively correlated with disengagement rates (QM(1) = 6.80, P < .01) accounting for almost a third of the heterogeneity (R 2 = 31.65%, QE(13) = 173.23, P < .0001), this increases to a slightly stronger and highly significant effect (QM(1) = 18.21, P < .0001) when an influential case (Z = 2.13) 7 is removed (R2 = 65.85%, QE(12) = 87.15, P < .0001) see figure 2C , case number 10.

also in 132,142 other papers

a trend towards significanceno p-value reported
Of the four remaining studies, 2 found a trend towards significance suggesting unemployment predicts disengagement 22 , 26 and one was a sub-sample of adolescents 21 and, therefore perhaps a different demographic.

also in 2,760 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.