a numerical trendp = 0.09
Follow-up post hoc did not find any significant differences, although there was a numerical trend of post-training increase in the PMC tDCS group [ t (11) = 1.86, p = 0.09] but not in other two groups [both p s > 0.22].
Follow-up post hoc did not find any significant differences, although there was a numerical trend of post-training increase in the PMC tDCS group [ t (11) = 1.86, p = 0.09] but not in other two groups [both p s > 0.22].