a trend towards significancep = 0.059
p = 0.044), while the inability to stay within the defined gating window consistently showed a trend towards significance (OR, 95% CI: 2.741, 0.961–7.818, p = 0.059).
p = 0.044), while the inability to stay within the defined gating window consistently showed a trend towards significance (OR, 95% CI: 2.741, 0.961–7.818, p = 0.059).
p = 0.044), while the inability to stay within the defined gating window consistently showed a trend towards significance (OR, 95% CI: 2.741, 0.961–7.818, p = 0.059).