marginally significantp = .077
Results revealed that (Figure 8 ) in the MPD condition, there was a marginally significant difference in the remembering rates of words associated with numbers 1, 2, and 3, F (2, 46) = 2.71, p = .077, ηp 2 = .11.
Results revealed that (Figure 8 ) in the MPD condition, there was a marginally significant difference in the remembering rates of words associated with numbers 1, 2, and 3, F (2, 46) = 2.71, p = .077, ηp 2 = .11.
In addition, as depicted in Figures 3 and 6 , the corrected recognition/remembering rates of target‐paired words demonstrated a declining trend with the prolonged predictive duration, while the corrected recognition/remembering of baseline‐paired and distractor‐paired words exhibited an increasing trend with the extension of predictive duration.