Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Comparative Analysis of Dosimetry: IMRT versus 3DCRT in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients with Considering Some Organs in Out - of - Field Borders.

Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) · 2024 · PMC11382807 · PMID 39253547

1
hedged sentence
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantno p-value reported
The Ipsilateral Lung Referring to Table 2 , the findings of this study showed that, with the exception of V20% and D-max, respectively, the 3-D and IMRT differed significantly in D-min and V80% received by the corresponding volumes of the left lung and a highly significant difference in the D-mean. 51–57 Volume enclosed by approximately 40% of the approved dose (20Gy) is another parameter that is estimated to allow for more comparisons between the two techniques, but the V80% shows that there is a significant difference between 3D and IMRT, which in the case of 3D is higher than IMRT.

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.